Land reformLease cancellationAdministrative justiceFarm downsizing
legislation
Statutes Cited
Administrative Justice Act
Administrative Justice Act
Administrative Justice Act
Administrative Justice Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Minister's decision to cancel the lease was irrational and unreasonable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Changing reasons for cancellation, lack of proper consideration of representations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the administrative action violated the Administrative Justice Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Failure to act reasonably and fairly, changing justifications"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, who are husband and wife, were allocated Holmehead Farm under the land reform programme in 2004. In 2020-2021, the first respondent (Minister) first indicated intention to withdraw the offer to downsize the farm, then cancelled the 99-year lease for alleged underutilization. The applicants challenged this decision as irrational and unreasonable.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases