question of lawgross misdirectionreinstatementarbitrator's decision
Tags
appeal against arbitral awardquestion of lawgross misdirection
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether grounds of appeal raise questions of law as envisaged by section 98(10) of Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All grounds of appeal presented by appellant"}
{"issue_text":"Whether first ground alleging gross misdirection on facts constitutes question of law","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's finding on respondent's discretion to return"}
{"issue_text":"Whether fourth ground on procedural remedy of reinstatement constitutes question of law","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's order for reinstatement or negotiation of damages"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against an arbitral award. The dispute centered on whether the respondent employee wilfully disobeyed a lawful instruction to return to Unki Mine, and whether the arbitrator erred in finding that physical presence at the mine was not necessary.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases