{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in law by holding that respondents were entitled to bush allowance under SI 45/1993 when they were employed in the tobacco industry","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents employed in tobacco industry; SI 45/93 applies to commercial sector"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in proceeding to quantify and award bush allowance after finding SI 45/93 inapplicable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator found SI inapplicable but still ordered payment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents were employed by the appellant on 2-year fixed contracts. After non-renewal, they claimed unlawful termination and non-payment of bush allowances. The arbitrator found termination lawful but ordered payment of bush allowances under SI 45/1993, which the appellant contested as inapplicable to the tobacco industry.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases