fixed term contractspermanent employments 12(3) Labour Actemployer-employee relationship
Tags
employment contractfixed term contractlabour arbitration
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether there existed an employer-employee relationship between Schweppes and Takaendesa","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Successive fixed term contracts, termination form signed December 2010, contract with Lorimark signed January 2011"}
{"issue_text":"Whether s 12(3) of the Labour Act applied to convert fixed term contracts to permanent status","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contracts had specific durations, parties agreed to fixed terms"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in not making findings on damages","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Damages issue was argued before arbitrator"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, Schweppes Zimbabwe, employed the respondent on successive one-month fixed term contracts from November 2009 to December 2010. The respondent later signed a contract with Lorimark Staffing Services in January 2011. An arbitrator found that the respondent had become a permanent employee of Schweppes and had been unfairly dismissed, ordering reinstatement and back pay.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases