Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Sergeant Mande 047375T and Constable Mhaka O 081215B v The Chairman of the Police Service Commission and The Commissioner General of Police and The Minister of Home Affairs

HH 605-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
13 September 2017
Citation
HH 605-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 605
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
TAGU J
Full Bench
TAGU J
Areas of Law
Administrative lawPolice lawProcedural law
Keywords
Founding affidavitCommissioner of oathsPoint in liminePolice Service CommissionReinstatement
Tags
Police disciplinary proceedingsDeclaratory reliefProcedural defect
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Immigration Act 1971
  • Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
  • Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 1987
  • Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993
  • Asylum and Immigration Act 1996
  • Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997
  • Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
  • Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005
  • Terrorism Act 2000
  • Extradition Act 1989
  • Extradition Act 2003
  • Criminal Justice Act 1988
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  • Data Protection Act 1998
  • Freedom of Information Act 2000
  • Official Secrets Act 1989
  • Security Service Act 1989
  • Intelligence Services Act 1994
  • Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
  • Civil Aviation Act 1982
  • Aviation Security Act 1982
  • Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990
  • Carriage by Air Act 1961
  • Carriage by Air (Application of Provisions) Order 1967
  • Carriage by Air Acts (Application of Provisions) Order 1967
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2000
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 2) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 3) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 4) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 5) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 6) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 7) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 8) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 9) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 10) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 11) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 12) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 13) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 14) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 15) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 16) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 17) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 18) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 19) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 20) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 21) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 22) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 23) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 24) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 25) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 26) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 27) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 28) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 29) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 30) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 31) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 32) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 33) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 34) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 35) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 36) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 37) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 38) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 39) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 40) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 41) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 42) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 43) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 44) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 45) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 46) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 47) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 48) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 49) Order 2002
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) (No 50) Order 2002
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the founding affidavit was fatally defective for being stamped with a certifying stamp instead of being commissioned by a commissioner of oaths","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The founding affidavit bore a certifying stamp"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Two former police officers sought a declaratory order compelling their reinstatement to the Police Service after being discharged following disciplinary proceedings. Their application was dismissed on procedural grounds due to a defective founding affidavit.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →