agreement of salecancellationpayment disputedispute of factreferral to trial
Tags
agreement of salecancellationdispute of fact
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
–
t
h
e
c
o
u
r
t
r
e
l
i
e
d
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
c
o
m
m
o
n
-
l
a
w
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether there were material disputes of fact requiring referral to trial","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Conflicting evidence on payment method and authorisation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants entered into an agreement of sale with the first respondent for a property in Harare. A dispute arose over whether the purchase price was paid as required by the agreement. The first respondent cancelled the agreement alleging non-payment, while the appellants claimed they paid the deposit and instalments to the second respondent (first respondent's wife) on his instructions.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases