Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Sharon Mugari (nee Tapfuma) v Clifford Mugari

HH 689-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
12 October 2022
Citation
HH 689-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 689
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Maxwell J
Full Bench
Maxwell J
Areas of Law
Family LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
consent papercivil imprisonmentsubstituted servicepersonal servicerule 15(12)rule 19
Tags
divorceconsent papercivil imprisonmentsubstituted servicepersonal service
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether substituted service of civil imprisonment summons should be permitted where personal service has not been effected","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant unable to serve respondent personally at workplace; parties involved in separate litigation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Parties signed a consent paper in divorce proceedings whereby respondent agreed to pay applicant USD1200 within 12 months. A decree of divorce was granted incorporating the consent paper. Respondent failed to pay, applicant issued civil imprisonment summons but could not personally serve respondent at his workplace. Applicant sought substituted service at workplace and respondent's lawyers in another matter.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →