Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Sharpstone Garande and 11 Others v Eastboy Fashions (Pvt) Ltd and 4 Others

HH 754-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
14 November 2018
Citation
HH 754-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 754
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MATHONSI J
Full Bench
MATHONSI J
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil ProcedureContempt of Court
Keywords
contempt of courtconsent ordersubstantial compliancewillful disobediencecourt order enforcement
Tags
contempt of courtconsent orderproperty developmentsubdivision
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether substantial compliance with a court order can excuse full compliance","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents claimed 95% roadworks complete"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the failure to comply with the court order was willful","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents sold other properties but refused to commit proceeds"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants brought contempt of court proceedings against the first and second respondents for failure to comply with a consent order granted on 8 November 2017. The order required the respondents to complete subdivision requirements and transfer shares in Lot 98 Meyrick Park Marlbereign to the applicants within specified timeframes. More than a year later, the respondents had not complied, claiming substantial compliance and financial challenges.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →