Banking and finance lawInvestment lawConstitutional law (alternative relief)Exchange control regulations
Keywords
Unit trust investmentCurrency redenominationExchange Control Directive RT120/2018Nostro FCARTGS FCA
Tags
Investment disputeCurrency conversionUnit trustsExchange control
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Reserve Bank Act
Reserve Bank Act
Collective Investment Schemes Act
Exchange Control Regulations
Finance Act (No. 2) Act of 2019
Finance Act (No. 2) Act of 2019
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the application properly combined constitutional and non-constitutional relief","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application sought both contractual and constitutional relief"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant established cause of action against properly cited respondents","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Fourth to sixth respondents joined but no amended papers filed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant's investment should have remained in USD as Nostro FCA","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no (not reached)","related_facts":"Funds were USD cash deposits from international employment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether currency conversion legislation was unconstitutional","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no (abandoned)","related_facts":"Conversion affected property rights and equal protection"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a retired accountant, invested USD$72,232.87 with Old Mutual entities in a unit trust scheme between 2010-2015. Following currency reforms in 2018-2019, her investment was converted to local currency, which she challenged claiming constitutional violations and breach of contract.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases