Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Shepherd Chimutanda v Edward Buwu and Fani Lesley Buwu

HH 122-23

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
15 February 2023
Citation
HH 122-23
Neutral Citation
[2023] ZWHH 122
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
KATIYO J
Full Bench
KATIYO J
Areas of Law
Contempt of courtCorporate lawCivil procedure
Keywords
Contempt of courtScheme managerCorporate rescueCourt orderMisjoinder
Tags
Contempt of courtScheme of arrangementCorporate rescue
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 2
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 4
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • H
  • o
  • u
  • s
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 9
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 1
  • E
  • q
  • u
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • y
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 0
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • S
  • u
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • (
  • n
  • o
  • w
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • i
  • o
  • r
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • )
  • C
  • i
  • v
  • i
  • l
  • P
  • r
  • o
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • T
  • r
  • i
  • b
  • u
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • s
  • ,
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • E
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
  • L
  • e
  • g
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • i
  • d
  • ,
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • h
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • e
  • n
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 3
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • T
  • r
  • i
  • b
  • u
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • s
  • (
  • J
  • u
  • d
  • i
  • c
  • i
  • a
  • r
  • y
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • F
  • u
  • n
  • c
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • S
  • t
  • a
  • f
  • f
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 8
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
  • J
  • u
  • d
  • i
  • c
  • i
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • v
  • i
  • e
  • w
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 2
  • 2
  • A
  • d
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • v
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • J
  • u
  • d
  • i
  • c
  • i
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • v
  • i
  • e
  • w
  • G
  • u
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • 2
  • 0
  • 2
  • 3
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has properly cited the parties in contempt proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's appointment as scheme manager"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there has been misjoinder or non-joinder of necessary parties","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Multiple companies involved in scheme"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether a person can be in contempt of a court order they are not party to","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondents not parties to HC 5869/17"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, acting as scheme manager of several companies under a scheme of arrangement, brought contempt of court proceedings against the respondents for allegedly disobeying a court order HC 5869/17 dated 05 July 2017. The respondents raised three points in limine: mis-citation of parties, misjoinder/non-joinder of interested parties, and lack of authority/capacity to act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →