{"issue_text":"Whether the principal officer required a board resolution to discipline the appellant","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Principal officer conducted disciplinary proceedings without board resolution"}
{"issue_text":"Whether investigation must precede suspension in disciplinary proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Investigation and suspension sequence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there was sufficient evidence to prove wilful disobedience to lawful order","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Email deletion instruction, 5-month delay, laptop allocation to junior"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the dismissal penalty was appropriate","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature of misconduct, employer's discretion"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, an employee of the respondent pension fund, was dismissed for wilfully disobeying a lawful instruction to delete a former employee's email account and for providing a junior officer with access to confidential information on a laptop. He delayed executing the deletion instruction for five months.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases