mining disputeadministrative reviewfunctus officioright to be heard
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Act
High Court Act
Mines and Minerals Act
Mines and Minerals Act
Mines and Minerals Act
Administrative Justice Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether there was gross procedural irregularity in not affording parties the right to be heard before the second determination","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second determination issued on 8 January 2024 without hearing"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent was functus officio after issuing the first determination","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First determination issued on 1 December 2022, second determination on 8 January 2024"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the second determination was unlawful, irrational, arbitrary and grossly unreasonable","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second determination contradicted factual findings of first determination"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
A mining dispute arose between the applicant and second respondent regarding the Chifumbi 2 mine. The first respondent (Provincial Mining Director) issued a determination on 1 December 2022 finding in favour of the applicant. Subsequently, on 8 January 2024, the first respondent issued another determination cancelling the applicant's mining certificate and allowing the second respondent to mine, purportedly acting under instructions from the Secretary of Mines.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases