Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Sibonile Dube v (1) Paul Murehwa (2) Minister of Local Government, Public Works and National Housing N.O.

SC 68/21

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
28 May 2021
Citation
SC 68/21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWSC 68
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MAVANGIRA JA
Full Bench
Guvava JAMavangira JAKudya AJA
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
DeclaraturMaterial disputes of factBalance of probabilitiesLease agreementHousing cooperativeProperty allocation
Tags
Property rightsLease agreementsHousing cooperativesDeclaratory relief
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 0
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • P
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • E
  • v
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 4
  • R
  • e
  • g
  • u
  • l
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • I
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • g
  • a
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • P
  • o
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 1
  • T
  • e
  • r
  • r
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • i
  • c
  • i
  • a
  • l
  • S
  • e
  • c
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 9
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • E
  • x
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • d
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • A
  • s
  • y
  • l
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • (
  • T
  • r
  • e
  • a
  • t
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • l
  • a
  • i
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • e
  • t
  • c
  • .
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
  • P
  • r
  • e
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • T
  • e
  • r
  • r
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
  • S
  • e
  • r
  • i
  • o
  • u
  • s
  • O
  • r
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • e
  • d
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
  • T
  • e
  • r
  • r
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • -
  • T
  • e
  • r
  • r
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8
  • L
  • e
  • g
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • i
  • d
  • ,
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • h
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • e
  • n
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • I
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • g
  • a
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • P
  • o
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 6
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in finding no material disputes of fact requiring trial","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Conflicting claims to property, validity of lease agreement, allocation authority"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in granting declaratory order in favor of first respondent","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First respondent's lease agreement, appellant's lack of lease, Ministry's confirmation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant and first respondent both claimed rights to Stand 6401 Retreat Waterfalls. The first respondent had a lease agreement with the Ministry and was allocated the property through Joseph Chinotimba Housing Co-operative. The appellant claimed allocation through Samora Machel Housing Co-operative. The High Court granted a declaratory order in favor of the first respondent.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →