Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Simar Continental (Private) Limited v Specialised Transport and Mr Tewe N.O.

HB 137/21

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
22 July 2021
Citation
HB 137/21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHB 137
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
DUBE-BANDA J
Full Bench
DUBE-BANDA J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureHigh Court Rules
Keywords
urgencycertificate of urgencyexecutiondefault judgmentrescission
Tags
urgent applicationstay of executiondefault judgmentcertificate of urgency
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • M
  • u
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • (
  • A
  • b
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • D
  • e
  • a
  • t
  • h
  • P
  • e
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • t
  • y
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 5
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 1
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • S
  • e
  • r
  • v
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • P
  • o
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • L
  • e
  • g
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • i
  • d
  • ,
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • h
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • e
  • n
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • e
  • n
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • R
  • e
  • h
  • a
  • b
  • i
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 4
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has satisfied the requirements for urgency","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's alleged knowledge since November 2020; delay in approaching court; certificate of urgency content"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Applicant sought urgent interim relief to stay execution of a default judgment for USD $29 700 obtained by 1st respondent in HC 457/19. Applicant claimed it was unaware of the judgment until threatened with execution scheduled for 12 July 2021. 1st respondent opposed urgency, alleging applicant had knowledge since November 2020.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →