Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Simbarashe Malunga & 2 Others v Shingirai Youth Centre

[2013] ZWLC 680

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
6 December 2013
Citation
[2013] ZWLC 680
Judgment No.
LC/H/680/13
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
L Kudya
Full Bench
L Kudya
Areas of Law
Labour lawEmployment contracts
Keywords
casual workerspermanent employeesarbitrationreinstatement
Tags
casual employmentpermanent employmentarbitral award appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act (Chapter 28:01)
  • Labour Act (Chapter 28:01)
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding appellants were casual employees when they had worked beyond statutory casual employment limits","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Worked more than 6 weeks in consecutive four months; worked over 2 years; on 2 week contracts at termination"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the appeal raised points of law as required by Section 98(10)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants argued arbitrator failed to exercise discretion properly"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellants, employed by respondent in varying capacities for over 2 years, challenged their dismissal and underpayment at arbitration. The arbitrator ruled they were casual workers. They appealed, arguing they had become permanent employees by operation of law due to working beyond statutory casual employment limits.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →