rescissiondefault judgmentprayerfounding affidavitheads of argument
Tags
rescission of judgmentprocedural defectpoint in limine
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
-
n
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
w
e
r
e
c
i
t
e
d
o
r
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether an application can proceed where the founding affidavit lacks a prayer for relief but the prayer appears in heads of argument","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Founding affidavit had no prayer; prayer appeared in heads of argument"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought rescission of a default judgment issued on 18 November 2015. The respondent raised a point in limine arguing that the founding affidavit lacked a prayer for relief, with the prayer only appearing in heads of argument filed on 27 June 2016.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases