Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Constitutional Court

Sister Berry (Nee Ncube) & Anor v The Chief Immigration Officer & Anor

[2016] ZWCCZ 4

Case Details

Court
Constitutional Court
Date
15 June 2016
Citation
[2016] ZWCCZ 4
Judgment No.
CCZ 4/16
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
CHIDYAUSIKU CJ
Author
GWAUNZA JCC
Full Bench
CHIDYAUSIKU CJMALABA DCJZIYAMBI JCCGWAUNZA JCCGOWORA JCCHLATSHWAYO JCCPATEL JCCGUVAVA JCCMAVANGIRA AJCC
Areas of Law
Constitutional lawImmigration lawHuman rights
Keywords
prohibited personspousal residence permitfreedom of movementmarriage to citizenimmigration status
Tags
immigrationconstitutional rightsfreedom of movementmarriageprohibited person
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20/2013)
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20/2013)
  • Immigration Act
  • Immigration Act
  • Immigration Act
  • Immigration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the second applicant's status as a prohibited person was negated by his marriage to the first applicant","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second applicant was prohibited person at time of marriage; marriage occurred after conviction"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there has been any infringement of the applicants' fundamental right to freedom of movement","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First applicant claims right to reside with spouse in Zimbabwe; second applicant is prohibited person"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants are entitled to the relief sought","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants seek declaratur and orders compelling entry and residence permit"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The first applicant, a Zimbabwean citizen, married the second applicant, a US citizen who had been convicted of drug possession in the USA and was therefore a prohibited person under Zimbabwean immigration law. The applicants challenged the refusal to grant the second applicant entry and residence in Zimbabwe, claiming it violated the first applicant's constitutional right to freedom of movement and residence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →