Aggravated Indecent AssaultMental DisabilityConsentWitness CompetencyRetrospective Application of Sentence
Tags
Aggravated Indecent AssaultMentally Challenged ComplainantConsentCompetency of Witness
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Mental Health Act
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Amendment Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether a mentally challenged person can consent to sexual intercourse","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Complainant has mild-moderate intellectual disability; sexual acts occurred"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the complainant was competent to testify","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Psychiatric report stated complainant was incapable of testifying"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the sentence of 15 years could be imposed retrospectively","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Offences occurred before Amendment Act No. 10/2023"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a female adult, was convicted of two counts of aggravated indecent assault for having sexual intercourse with Shepherd Moyo, a male adult with mild-moderate intellectual disability, without his consent during January-June 2023. She appealed against both conviction and sentence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases