Pension fundAsset managementSharesBreach of agreementSet-off
Tags
Pension fund administrationAsset managementBreach of contractSet-off
legislation
Statutes Cited
Pensions and Provident Funds Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant breached agreement by not handing over shares","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant withheld shares upon termination; agreement required return of all assets"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff entitled to return of shares","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Shares belong to plaintiff; defendant breached agreement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant entitled to set off alleged debt against share value","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant claimed ZW$481 million debt; sought to appropriate shares worth ZW$8.5 billion"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff pension fund sued the defendant insurance company for breach of an asset management agreement by withholding 40,300 Delta shares and 8,590 Old Mutual shares belonging to the plaintiff upon termination of the mandate. The defendant claimed it was entitled to set off these shares against alleged debts owed by the plaintiff.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases