{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to determine a dispute of right after the amendment of section 93(5) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The dispute concerned terminal benefits; the Labour Amendment Act No 5/15 was promulgated before referral to arbitration"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by failing to stay the determination pending a constitutional application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The court found it unnecessary to deal with this ground"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents, former employees of Spar Harare (Pvt) Ltd, filed a complaint for non-payment of terminal benefits after their services were terminated on 31 July 2015. A labour officer referred the matter to arbitration, resulting in an award ordering payment of USD23 179.42. The employer appealed, arguing the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction due to amendments to the Labour Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases