{"issue_text":"Whether the work assigned was task work as defined in the Collective Bargaining Agreement","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Employees worked beyond normal hours; failure to complete tasks led to dismissal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the agreement to work overtime was valid and legal under SI 45/93","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No 24-hour notice given; employees worked 10.5-11.5 hours"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondents' conduct constituted sabotage under the Code of Conduct","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employees withdrew labour after commencing overtime; alleged US$14,000 loss"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Employees worked overtime without 24-hour notice, left before completing tasks after working 10.5-11.5 hours. Employer dismissed them for sabotage. Negotiating Committee ordered reinstatement. Employer appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases