Anton Piller orderBinding effectParty citationDeclaratory order
Tags
Anton Piller orderDeclaratory reliefParty citation
legislation
Statutes Cited
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
1
9
5
0
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
I
m
p
r
i
s
o
n
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
5
P
r
i
s
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
9
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
1
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
0
7
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
8
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether an Anton Piller order is binding on entities that are not cited as parties to the application but whose premises are listed for search","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants were not cited as parties but their premises were listed for search"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent obtained an Anton Piller order against various entities to search for and seize share certificates. The applicants, who were listed in the order as premises to be searched but were not cited as parties to the application, sought a declaratory order that the orders were not binding on them.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases