{"issue_text":"Whether condonation should be granted for late filing of arbitral record","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Record filed 8 days after review application, no prejudice to respondents"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the main application was properly brought under Article 34 Model Law despite referring to \"review\"","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application alleged public-policy conflict and gross irregularity; filed within 3 months"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought condonation for late filing of the arbitral record in its application to set aside an arbitral award. The respondents opposed, arguing the main review application was a nullity because it was brought under Order 33 instead of Article 34 of the Model Law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases