{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction to determine the dispute when the registered collective bargaining agreement provided for an exclusive appeals procedure","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"SI 323 of 1993 was the registered CBA; dispute was referred to arbitration instead of appeals committee"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there was gross irregularity in the arbitration proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Proceedings were null due to lack of jurisdiction"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Seventeen employees were dismissed for participating in a collective job action organized by their trade union. After conciliation failed, the dispute was referred to arbitration. The employer sought review of the arbitral award, arguing the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction as the dispute should have been handled through the appeals procedure under the registered collective bargaining agreement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases