{"issue_text":"Whether defendant intentionally, maliciously and frivolously caused criminal prosecution against plaintiffs","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant reported incident to police; police arrested and prosecuted plaintiffs"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiffs suffered damages as direct result of defendant's conduct","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Plaintiffs lost employment and claimed reputational damage"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant is liable for damages for malicious prosecution","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All facts relating to prosecution and defendant's role"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Three security guards employed by Mutual Finance demonstrated at their workplace over a colleague being forced to carry a stone as punishment. They were arrested for disorderly conduct, prosecuted and acquitted. They sued their employer for malicious prosecution claiming damages for loss of reputation, humiliation and loss of employment.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases