correction of judgmentrescissionspecially executableRule 29duplication of orders
Tags
correction of judgmentrescissionHigh Court Rules Rule 29specially executable property
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the court should correct the judgment by deleting paragraph 2 which duplicated an extant order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The judgment contained a duplicated portion relating to payment orders"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought correction of a judgment delivered on 21 March 2025 (HH196-25) which had erroneously included a duplicated portion of an extant order relating to payment of capital sum, interest and costs of suit. The application was brought under Rule 29 of the High Court Rules, 2021.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases