Susan Rufudza v Oliver Masomera N.O. (in his capacity as the Executor dative in the Estate of the Late Socrates Zimunhu) and Tinashe Magaiza and Abigail Magaiza and The Master of the High Court
{"issue_text":"Must an applicant seeking condonation for late filing of a review application also seek extension of time under Rule 62(4) SI 202/21?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed over five years after decision; no request for extension of time made"}
{"issue_text":"Is the order relied upon super-annuated and in need of revival?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Parties were husband and wife until death; revival conceded unnecessary"}
{"issue_text":"Has applicant exhausted internal remedies by failing to complain under s 116 Administration of Estates Act?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No formal complaint filed; no request for inquiry into executor's conduct"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, former wife of the deceased, seeks condonation to file late a review of the Master’s consent granted to the executor dative to sell the matrimonial house. She claims a 40% share awarded on divorce and alleges illegality in the consent process. The matter is opposed on procedural grounds.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases