Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Sylvia Rosemary Mabhudza v Phineas Mabhudza

HH 15-2005

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
9 February 2005
Citation
HH 15-2005
Neutral Citation
[2005] ZWHH 15
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Kamocha J
Full Bench
Kamocha J
Areas of Law
Family LawMatrimonial Property Law
Keywords
DivorceMatrimonial assetsProperty divisionMarriage breakdownSpousal contributions
Tags
DivorceMatrimonial property divisionSpousal maintenance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • i
  • s
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • d
  • o
  • e
  • s
  • n
  • o
  • t
  • i
  • n
  • v
  • o
  • k
  • e
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • M
  • a
  • t
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • a
  • l
  • C
  • a
  • u
  • s
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • n
  • y
  • o
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • n
  • a
  • c
  • t
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • ;
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • r
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • e
  • q
  • u
  • i
  • t
  • a
  • b
  • l
  • e
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • g
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • m
  • a
  • t
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • a
  • l
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • r
  • t
  • y
  • d
  • i
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"What constitutes fair and reasonable division of matrimonial assets?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"36-year marriage, both parties' contributions, defendant's misconduct"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The parties were married for 36 years since 1968 under customary law, later solemnized under the Marriage Act in 1995. They have three adult children. The marriage irretrievably broke down due to defendant's infidelity and withdrawal of financial support. The sole issue was fair division of matrimonial assets. Plaintiff contributed through childcare, household management, employment income, and purchasing household items. Defendant was the primary breadwinner but diverted substantial resources to his mistress and child for seven years.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →