{"issue_text":"Whether parties should have shared custody instead of defendant getting sole custody","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Children in boarding school, both parents capable, stability concerns"}
{"issue_text":"What access arrangements should apply if one party gets custody","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Children in boarding, school holidays, exeat weekends"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant entitled to 50% share of Zvishavane property","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Matrimonial home, indirect contributions, fully paid during marriage"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant entitled to 30% share of Bulawayo property","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Acquired 5 months before separation, still mortgaged, no indirect contributions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties, married since December 2012 with two minor children, agreed their marriage had irretrievably broken down. They disputed custody arrangements and division of two immovable properties acquired during marriage - a fully paid Zvishavane house and a Bulawayo property still under mortgage until 2037.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases