TAMIRA OVERSEAS SA v OLIVER MASOMERA and AQUARIUM TRADING (PVT) LTD and MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT and TALEB MAHOMED and SANDRA VAN ROOYEN

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether a peregrinus applicant must provide security for costs when not specifically requested","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant is foreign company"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether foreign companies need local registration to approach court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant not locally registered"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether applicant needed court leave to sue company under judicial management","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"HC 2020/14 order required stay of proceedings"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether matter constitutes lis pendens","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Related matters pending"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether matter is urgent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Certificate of urgency issued"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether applicant established prima facie case for interdict","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Judicial manager incurring expenses without consultation"}

Background