Labour arbitration appealSection 98(10) Labour ActGross misdirection
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
1
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
.
5
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
.
6
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
.
3
P
r
i
s
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
5
2
P
r
i
s
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
9
(
S
I
1
9
9
9
/
7
2
8
)
P
a
r
o
l
e
B
o
a
r
d
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
0
4
(
S
I
2
0
0
4
/
1
8
3
7
)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal raise questions of law as required by section 98(10) of Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All grounds of appeal challenge factual findings of arbitrator"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator's finding on unlawful termination constitutes gross misdirection","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator concluded contrary to evidence placed before him"}
{"issue_text":"Whether award of thirty leave days instead of contractual twenty-five raises question of law","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract provides for twenty-five leave days, arbitrator awarded thirty"}
{"issue_text":"Whether medical aid contribution order was competent","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Medical aid scheme meant for during employment, respondent had no medical expenses"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against an arbitration award that found the respondent's employment contract was unlawfully terminated and awarded various benefits including notice pay, leave days, transport allowance, commission, medical aid contributions and compensation for stolen property.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases