Tapiwa Hombarume v K M Insurance Company

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in accepting evidence from S Chauruka, director of an uncited company","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"S Chauruka testified despite Caprisun not being party to proceedings"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator based his award on evidence never produced at hearing","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Allegation of bias and favour for respondent"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator disregarded evidence of Innocent Naka","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Innocent Naka's affidavit not properly considered"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the relationship between respondent and Caprisun affects liability","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Companies are sister companies under same holding company"}

Background