overtimewage underpaymentarbitral awardsection 98(10) Labour Act
Tags
overtime claimwage underpaymentarbitral award appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the appeal raises questions of law as required by section 98(10) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All grounds of appeal relate to factual findings and arbitrator's assessment of evidence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator misdirected herself on points of law regarding evidence and burden of proof","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's grounds alleging arbitrator disregarded evidence and misplaced burden of proof"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a till operator employed by respondent from 2 May 2009 to 7 April 2015 when dismissed for misconduct, claimed underpayment of wages and non-payment of overtime. An arbitrator dismissed the claim for failure to prove. The appellant appealed on grounds that the arbitrator misdirected herself on points of law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases