TAPSON MADZIVIRE and PHINIAS NGARAVA and JOSEPH DANIEL MUBWANDARIKA and CRUSH SECURITY (PVT) LTD versus MISHECK BRIAN ZVARIWADZWA and COBRA SECURITY (PVT) LTD and THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
Company lawCorporate governanceDirectors' authorityFoss v Harbottle rule
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
–
t
h
e
c
o
u
r
t
r
e
l
i
e
d
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
c
o
m
m
o
n
-
l
a
w
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have authority to bring this application on behalf of the company","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No board resolution produced; applicants are directors"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicants can bring this application in their personal capacities as directors and shareholders","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Wrong done to company; applicants are majority shareholders"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, who are directors and shareholders of Crush Security (Pvt) Ltd, brought an application alleging that the first respondent had forged company documents filed with the Registrar of Companies. The application was brought both on behalf of the company and in their personal capacities as directors and shareholders.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases