{"issue_text":"Whether arbitral award violates public policy of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award requiring 266% salary increase, applicant's financial position, tariff controls"}
{"issue_text":"Whether award is contrary to public policy in its effect","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Impact on employer-employee relationship, economic fabric of nation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to set aside an arbitral award dated 29 March 2004 regarding salary and wage negotiations. The dispute arose from quarterly salary reviews based on median Market Quarterly (MMQ) figures, with parties disagreeing on whether MMQ represented forecasts or actual salary increments. The arbitrator's award was challenged as violating Zimbabwean public policy.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases