condonationextension of timereview applicationtaxation of costsrecusal
legislation
Statutes Cited
Supreme Court Rules, 2018
Supreme Court Rules, 2018
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has made out a case for recusal of Mathonsi JA","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Previous judgment in Bonde v National Foods SCB 2/19"}
{"issue_text":"Whether condonation is required for an application under r 13 of Supreme Court Rules","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application brought under r 13, no time limits specified"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the application should be struck off the roll","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application fundamentally flawed, no proper basis for condonation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought condonation and extension of time to note a review application against the taxation of a bill of costs. The taxation arose from a previous dismissal of his appeal with costs. The applicant also sought the recusal of Mathonsi JA on grounds of alleged bias.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases