disciplinary hearingarbitration awardsection 101(6) Labour Act
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding that the employer had jurisdiction to conduct the employee's disciplinary hearing when the matter had been referred to the Ministry under section 101(6) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Notification dated 15 November 2010, hearing on 9 December 2010, postponement requested by appellant, referral to Conciliator on 2 February 2011"}
{"issue_text":"Whether an employee can use delays created by himself to oust the employer's jurisdiction in disciplinary matters","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant requested postponement which caused delay beyond 30 days"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the employer could resume jurisdiction after referral under section 101(6) of the Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Conciliator remitted matter back to employer's disciplinary committee"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant employee referred a disciplinary matter to a Labour Officer under section 101(6) of the Labour Act after 30 days had lapsed from notification of disciplinary proceedings. The arbitrator found the delay was caused by the appellant's own request for postponement and remitted the matter back to the employer's disciplinary committee.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases