Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Constitutional Court

Tendai Mashamanda v Bariade Investments (Private) Limited & 5 Ors

CCZ 9/23

Case Details

Court
Constitutional Court
Date
25 July 2023
Citation
CCZ 9/23
Neutral Citation
[2023] ZWCCZ 9
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Hlatshwayo JCC
Full Bench
Garwe JCCHlatshwayo JCCPatel JCC
Areas of Law
Constitutional lawProperty lawCivil procedure
Keywords
direct accessconstitutional infringementSupreme Court reviewpignus judicialelocus standi
Tags
direct accessconstitutional rightsSupreme Court review powerspignus judiciale
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
  • Supreme Court Act [Chapter 7:13]
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant has locus standi to challenge Supreme Court's exercise of review powers","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant was not party to proceedings reviewed"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether Supreme Court's review of default judgment infringed applicant's constitutional rights","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Supreme Court set aside judgment affecting applicant's property"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether direct access should be granted in interests of justice","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No constitutional matter properly raised"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought direct access to the Constitutional Court alleging that the Supreme Court had infringed his constitutional rights when it reviewed and set aside a High Court default judgment under section 25(2) of the Supreme Court Act. The applicant had purchased property at a sheriff's auction that was subject to ongoing litigation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →