Tererai Maraidza v Lytton Investments

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether appellant is owed arrear salaries and fringe benefits","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contractual salary and allowance provisions, admitted arrears"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether appellant is entitled to performance related salaries and benefits","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract provisions for performance pay, lack of assessments"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether respondent was entitled to deduct US$16,200 rent retrospectively","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Section 13(2) and 12A(6) of Labour Act, no consent for deduction"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether respondent was entitled to deduct US$21,660 for accident claim","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No jurisdiction for delictual damages, no causal connection"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether relocation was consensual","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Terms of reference limited"}

Background