Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

The Attorney-General v Globecast Africa

HH 114-08

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
4 November 2008
Citation
HH 114-08
Neutral Citation
[2008] ZWHH 114
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MUSAKWA J
Full Bench
MUSAKWA J
Areas of Law
Criminal LawBroadcasting LawRegulatory Offences
Keywords
broadcasting without licencemens reastrict liabilityclaim of rightTransmedia
Tags
broadcasting offencesregulatory offencesleave to appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Broadcasting Services Act
  • Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the offence under s 7(1) of the Broadcasting Services Act is one of strict liability","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Operation of equipment without licence; Transmedia's failure to obtain licence"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the respondent lacked mens rea and could rely on claim of right","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent's belief that Transmedia had procured licence; previous dealings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Globecast Africa, a South African company, brought satellite uplink equipment into Zimbabwe to cover the 2008 harmonized elections under an agreement with Transmedia Corporation, which was to obtain the necessary broadcasting licence. Transmedia failed to obtain the licence, yet Globecast's engineers operated the equipment, facilitating a satellite link between the Minister of Information and CNN. The magistrates' court acquitted Globecast at the close of the State case, holding that the offence required mens rea which the State had not proved.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →