{"issue_text":"Whether respondents were entitled to back-pay from dismissal date to reinstatement order date","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondents were dismissed and later awarded damages"}
{"issue_text":"Whether damages should be calculated using US Dollar rates prevailing on reinstatement order date","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"US Dollar was legal tender on 29 April 2010"}
{"issue_text":"Whether award of 10 months' salary equivalent as damages was reasonable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Precedents show range from ½ to 3 years' salary"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in awarding petrol and medical aid benefits","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant did not challenge these before arbitrator"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant school dismissed four employees who successfully challenged their dismissal through arbitration. The arbitrator ordered reinstatement or damages in lieu thereof and awarded each respondent US$12,065.80 as damages. The school appealed against the damages award, challenging the calculation methodology, currency denomination, and inclusion of benefits.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases