The Sheriff for Zimbabwe v Chandakafira Konde & Ors (HC 6525/22); The Sheriff for Zimbabwe v Mary Makwarimba & Ors (HC 6526/22); The Sheriff for Zimbabwe v Abena Letisia Chasowa & Ors (HC 6527/22)
{"issue_text":"Whether claimants are lawful owners of the properties despite registration in judgment debtor's name","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Properties registered in Select Housing Trust name; claimants allege allocation through cooperative"}
{"issue_text":"Whether special circumstances exist to warrant setting aside the attachment","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claimants' delay of 5-6 years; obtained certificates but no transfer"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there is collusion between judgment debtor and claimants","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Not specifically addressed in judgment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Three consolidated interpleader applications where claimants asserted ownership of three residential stands in Tynwald South, Harare that had been attached in execution of a judgment against Select Housing Trust. The properties were registered in the name of the judgment debtor but claimants alleged they had been allocated to them through a cooperative housing scheme.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases