{"issue_text":"Whether charge should cite amending regulations or amended principal Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Charge cited s 4(1) of SI 2 of 2024 instead of s 70(a) of Criminal Law Code"}
{"issue_text":"Whether incorrect charge citation prejudiced the accused","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Accused pleaded guilty and admitted all essential elements"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The accused was charged with and pleaded guilty to contravening s 4(1) of SI 2 of 2024 after having sexual intercourse with a 15-year-old girl. The review court found the charge citation incorrect as it referenced the amending regulations rather than the amended principal Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases