{"issue_text":"Whether the conviction was safe given the complainant's delayed complaint and initial refusal to disclose","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Complainant only disclosed accused's name under maternal pressure; complaint made over a year after alleged offence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the medical evidence was properly considered regarding timing of STI contraction","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"STI discovered in August 2010, alleged rape in April 2009"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The accused, a former domestic worker, was convicted of raping his employer's 11-year-old daughter in April 2009. The complaint only emerged in August 2010 when the child developed a sexually transmitted infection. The child initially refused to identify the perpetrator and only named the accused under maternal pressure.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases