{"issue_text":"Whether the appellants can introduce a new ground of appeal regarding non-compliance with SI 165 of 1992 procedures when this was not raised before the internal appeals authority","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The appellants only raised the procedural timeframes issue before the Labour Court, not during internal appeals"}
{"issue_text":"Whether it was proper to bundle six separate appeals into one matter","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Six separate disciplinary hearings and appeals were consolidated into one appeal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the guilty verdict was supported by a balance of probabilities based on the evidence presented","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Two security officers identified all appellants while two others did not see them; 2.387 kg of gold ore and nine dishes were found"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants were former employees of Arcturus Mine accused of gold panning near the mine in violation of the employer's Code of Conduct. Two security officers identified all six appellants at the scene, while two others did not see them. The disciplinary hearings were conducted outside the timeframes stipulated in SI 165 of 1992.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases