Thomas Pasi v Wonder Mushure and Others

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant is entitled to restoration of title over the property","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Original ownership, fraudulent transfer, possession of original deed"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the respondents obtained valid title from a thief","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Fraudulent transfer, bona fide purchase"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether non-joinder of professionals (estate agents, conveyancers) is fatal to the application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondents employed professionals for purchase and transfer"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether there is a genuine dispute of fact that cannot be resolved on papers","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondents' allegation of telephone conversation in 2009"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the claim has become prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alleged delay from 2009 to 2015"}

Background