Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

TM SUPERMARKETS (PVT) LTD v VENTURAS & SAMUKANGE

HH 30-2010

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
9 March 2010
Citation
HH 30-2010
Neutral Citation
[2010] ZWHH 30
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
PATEL J
Full Bench
PATEL JOMERJEE J
Areas of Law
Contract LawProperty Law
Keywords
LeaseRentalBreachCancellationPayment
Tags
Lease AgreementBreach of ContractCancellation
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Not Applicable
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in finding that the lease agreement entitled the respondent to cancel the lease after the breach complained of had been rectified","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Payment of outstanding rentals on 8 June 2009, acceptance of payment by respondent"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether clause 18(c) of the agreement entitled the respondent to accept rectification and still proceed to cancel the agreement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Clause 18 of lease agreement, acceptance of payment, subsequent cancellation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondent's lawyers wrote to the appellant indicating a breach of the lease agreement regarding non-payment of rentals since January 2009, demanding payment within 14 days. The appellant made payment on 8 June 2009, within the stipulated time. Despite this rectification, the respondent proceeded to cancel the lease agreement, which the magistrate upheld.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →