{"issue_text":"Whether the preliminary point regarding the validity of the Board Resolution should be upheld.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Validity of the Board Resolution identifying parties and proceedings."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the replacement arbitrator had authority to issue an award for proceedings he had not presided over.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Death of Arbitrator C. Moyo; replacement by C.V Chinembiri; written submissions."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred in ordering payment of outstanding terminal benefits despite finding that the appellant's contract had not been unfairly terminated.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's finding on unfair termination vs. award of terminal benefits."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal were concise and precise.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The grounds of appeal listed in the notice of appeal."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant/applicant was employed by the first respondent as an international driver. Following a dispute regarding insufficient book-outs, he was ordered to surrender keys and leave, which he claims constituted unfair dismissal. The initial arbitrator died after receiving written submissions. A replacement arbitrator issued a determination without oral hearings, leading to this combined review and appeal application.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases