{"issue_text":"Whether the opposing affidavit in case HC 1186/18 and the founding affidavit in case HC 1775/18 comply with Rule 227 of the High Court Rules, 1971","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The deponent Wu Yi Feng was not a witness at the arbitral hearing and claimed personal knowledge"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be registered as an order of this court","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The award was issued by Mr D.A. Whatman on 15 January 2018"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside on grounds of being contrary to public policy and fraud","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The respondent alleged the award violated contract law principles and was induced by fraud"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 18 June 2015 for the supply of sand. Disputes arose regarding contract price adjustments and cancellation, leading to arbitration. The arbitrator issued an award on 15 January 2018. The applicant sought registration of the award, while the respondent sought to set it aside, alleging it was contrary to public policy and obtained by fraud.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases