{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside on the grounds of public policy.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The arbitrator's findings on force majeure and price adjustment."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award was obtained by fraud.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged concealment of an email by the applicant."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant (Townsend) and respondent (Sinohydro) entered into a contract for the supply of washed sand. Due to severe weather conditions (El Nino-induced drought and heavy rains), the applicant claimed force majeure and sought a price adjustment. The respondent denied this claim and eventually terminated the contract. The dispute went to arbitration, where the arbitrator ruled in favor of the applicant. The respondent opposed the registration of the award, alleging public policy violations and fraud.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases